Biography of Fernando Botero Essay

Fernando Botero, also named the close Colombian of Colombian cunningists, has developed a manner the world nonices as his own. Fernando was born(p) in 1932 in Medellin, Colombia. Fernando came across concentrated takeing as a child, which deg time him from traditional graphics in museums and much(prenominal) cultural institutions. It was his uncompromising school tear down so that brought art to be an interest for Fernando, the school Botero attended was run by Jesuits who were strict and brought little enjoyment into Boteros life. To scratch enjoyment Botero began to draw at a young age.At that young age his inspiration was anything that interest him much(prenominal) as bullfighting. Fernando was a great fan of bullfights so he would paint scenes of this then change them in front of the arna for 5 pesos. He spent nearly cardinal years painting this subject. He had a growing interest in art his entire life he overlap his sights, and studied. When Botero was sevente en he worked for the Medellin newspaper, El Colombiano, coroneted Picasso and the Nonconformity of Art, which showed Boteros mind and how it is tie in with art.Botero is so well have a go at itn because of his jot style, robust and round objects and characters. Botero tells critics that he is evidently attracted to his form without knowing why. He claims that artists neer know why artists use a form, he claims the style is intuitive and that the news report for their style can be rationalized later on its adopted. Botero is difficult to understand, as he doesnt share his opinion with his art or even explaining his art. He shares his romance with us but not corpulent us how to feel about it. Navas- Nieves says. We know his works are personal as some of his famous works fancy his youth, The Bishop, The Nun, The Bullfighter, and The Widow.It is unbeknownst(predicate) to all(prenominal) in all except Botero however if these drawings muse the beauty with these no proportio nal, bright colored, amplify sized or the turmoil. Botero eliminated brushwork and texture in his paintings as he favored a smoother look. Boteros works are abstract and are educated by a Columbian upbringing and loving commentary. When Colombian children go to church they suss out all these Madonnas, so clean and perfect. In South America china-like perfection is very(prenominal) much a part of the holy man toilet of beauty.More so even than the polychrome wood sculptures in Spain, Latin American sculptures look like porcelain. So, in contrast to Europe or wedlock America, you connect the notions of art and beauty at a very early age. I grew up with the idea that art is beauty. each(prenominal) my life Ive been trying to sire art that is beautiful to discover all the elements that go to make up opthalmic perfection.When you bugger off from my background you cant be spoilt by beauty, because youve neer really seen it. If youre born in Paris, say, you can see art everywher e, so by the time you come to pee art yourself youre spoilt youre tired of beauty as such and want to do something else. With me it was quite different. I wasnt tired of beauty I was hungering for it. Botero said this knowing he was not raised with art, which is his beauty. The lack of art in his life made him develop such an original style. The church influences Botero, his baroque style was adopted from the church.Botero is the most Colombian of Colombian artists because of his insulation from international trends. Botero once remarked A painter can do things a photographer cant do, because a painter can make the unseeable visible. This thinking lead Botero to create a series of serious paintings about captive abuse in Abu Ghraib. Botero, through his paintings in this series allowed us to feel the prisoners suffering. The paintings brought us to the agony of the victims, the humiliation they felt and all the pain was transferred from the painting to us, making us the victi m.This series proved moreover Boteros skill of art. Many critics thought the series was out of Boteros league claiming that Boteros style cannot do justice to the unassumingness of the subject. Botero proved the critics wrong when he captures the perception of the victims. The difference between photographs and paintings are that photographs come with a story. Just something that happened. They can be beautiful but paintings show affects and perception and thoughts and different depictions. Much more thought goes into a painting, which sets the two apart.