Affirmative Action in the United States Essay -- Affirmative Action Pr

Affirmative activity in the United States Affirmative Action in the United States consists of the quick efforts that take into account race, sex and internal origin for the purpose of remedying and preventing discrimination. down the stairs the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal goernment requires certain businesses and educational institutions that scram federal funds to develop affirmative action programs. Such policies atomic number 18 enforced and monitored by both(prenominal) The Office of Federal Contract entry and The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Lazear 37).The most noteworthy admonition of affirmative action is that of the bloodless male population who insists that such programs are take forms of reverse discrimination. In contrast to their view, the United States Commission on Civil Rights argued until 1983 that only if society were operating fairly would measures that take race, sex, and national origin into account be preferential treatmen t. After the commission on well-mannered rights was reorganized in late 1983, however, it took the opposite position. By January of 1984, it ratified a statement that racial preferences merely constitute another form of unjustified discrimination. In recent years, however, affirmative action has keep to grow, and the number of controversies surrounding its existence is consistently augmented.In 1978, in University of calcium Regents v. Bakke, the U.S. Supreme Court held (5-4) that fixed quotas may not be line up for places for minority appli thronets for medical school if white applicants are denied a probability to compete for those places. The court, however, did say that professional schools may consider race as a factor in making decisions on admissions. More late than the Regents decision, in United Steelworkers of America V. Weber (1979) and Fullilove v. Klutznick (1980), the court continued to obtain for affirmative action.II. An Introduction to the ControversyThe tran sformation of affirmative action over the years is generally considered a negative and socially unfair one. Although the skipper intention of such programs with regard to minority management was one of an undeniably just nature, my research has clearly indicated that over the years, various legal trends take a shit drastically altered the socio-political implications of affirmative action often creating unfair situations for white males who are not part o... ...ope for in the current system is an augmentation in the number of companies educating their employees on multicultural human relations. Since the eventual long-term stopping point is to eliminate prejudice, the only way to do so in integrated America is to teach people about acceptance. Executive stereotyping only exists because mainstream stereotyping exists. Minorities can stop feeling like inferior tokens when whites stop regarding us as such and stereotyping us out of sheer ignorance.Affirmative action essential exi st at least as symbolism of this countrys commitment to civil rights. The thick blood of prejudice will still continue to put to death through the veins of U.S. society, despite upbeat talk about the increasingly change work force. Government-mandated hiring preferences prod companies into integrating their work force, and in the past cardinal years ofaffirmative action, blacks and other minorities have indeed benefitted both socially and economically. Individual businesses and the economy have profited, not lost. Until the United States conceives a recrudesce idea, it is most wise to maintain a policy that despite its flaws, is both a moral imperative and an economic necessity.